Full Width [alt+shift+f] Shortcuts [alt+shift+k]
Sign Up [alt+shift+s] Log In [alt+shift+l]

Improve your reading experience

Logged in users get linked directly to articles resulting in a better reading experience. Please login for free, it takes less than 1 minute.

More from Scarlet Ink

The Six Steps to Saying No — Why Being a Team Player is Not Necessarily Great

Frequently, saying no is better than saying yes. Our teams can concentrate on the highest value work if we set clear boundaries.

5 days ago 7 votes
Failure is Necessary for Achievement and Growth — Why Success is Dangerous for Learning

You can only succeed if you are willing to fail. You can only learn if you are willing to be terrible at first.

a week ago 11 votes
From Star Employee to Struggling Leader — A Simple Explanation of Your Manager's Incompetence

No manager wants to be a terrible boss. Yet even with the best of intentions, it's hard to avoid being at least moderately incompetent.

2 weeks ago 15 votes
You Can't Schedule Creativity: Putting Inspiration Into Your Outlook Calendar

Creation can't be forced, but it can certainly be encouraged gently.

3 weeks ago 16 votes
The Hidden Advantage of Sharp Edges — Why Being Disagreeable is Best

Anyone can be valuable if they have the right motivation, but strangely enough, being disagreeable multiplies that value.

a month ago 30 votes

More in life

Fast Cash vs. Slow Equity

Knowing what you're building

12 hours ago 3 votes
Hiring judgement

In the end, judgment comes first. And that means hiring is a gut decision. As much science as people want to try to pour into the hiring process, art always floats to the top. This is especially true when hiring at the executive level. The people who make the final calls — the ones who are judged on outcome, not effort — are ultimately hired based on experience and judgement. Two traits that are qualities, not quantities. They are tasked with setting direction, evaluating situations, and making decisions with limited information. All day long they are making judgment calls. That's what you hire them to do, and that's how you decide who to hire. Presented with a few finalists, you decide who you *think* will do a better job when they have to *think* about what to do in uncertain situations. This is where their experience and judgment come in. It's the only thing they have that separates them from someone else. Embrace the situation. You don't know, they don't know, everyone's guessing, some guess better than others. You can't measure how well someone's going to guess next time, you can only make assumptions based on other assumptions. Certainty is a mirage. In the art of people, everything is subjective. In the end, it's not about qualifications — it's about who you trust to make the right call when it matters most. Ultimately, the only thing that was objective was your decision. The reasons were not. -Jason

12 hours ago 3 votes
Orson Welles as Falstaff on Late Night TV

This post is in the Notebook - my digital workshop for anecdotes, links, excerpts, sketches, lists, and anything else I want to explore in brief, revisit later, or post for reference.

21 hours ago 2 votes
Classical Music Got Invented with a Hard Kick from a Peasant's Foot

Or why we need less math in music theory

11 hours ago 2 votes
A decade of dissent: the violence of the system

In the latest part of my retrospective essay on ten years of The Acorn, which I edit, I look back on its content in 2019.

2 hours ago 1 votes