Full Width [alt+shift+f] Shortcuts [alt+shift+k]
Sign Up [alt+shift+s] Log In [alt+shift+l]
29
Following the thread of any seemingly quantitative issue in AI ethics (such as determining if software to rate loan applicants is racially biased or evaluating YouTube’s recommendation system) quickly leads to a host of qualitative questions. Unfortunately, there is often a large divide between computer scientists and social scientists, with over-simplified assumptions and fundamental misunderstandings of one another.
over a year ago

Improve your reading experience

Logged in users get linked directly to articles resulting in a better reading experience. Please login for free, it takes less than 1 minute.

More from fast.ai

fasttransform: Reversible Pipelines Made Simple

Introducing fasttransform, a Python library that makes data transformations reversible and extensible through the power of multiple dispatch.

2 months ago 10 votes
What AI can tell us about microscope slides

A friendly introduction to Foundation Models for Computational Pathology

2 months ago 27 votes
What AI can tell us about microscope slides

A friendly introduction to Foundation Models for Computational Pathology

3 months ago 22 votes
A New Chapter for fast.ai: How To Solve It With Code

fast.ai is joining Answer.AI, and we’re announcing a new kind of educational experience, ‘How To Solve It With Code’

5 months ago 65 votes
In defense of screen time

Pundits say my husband and I are parenting wrong.

6 months ago 81 votes

More in AI

AI #113: The o3 Era Begins

Enjoy it while it lasts.

4 days ago 6 votes
OpenAI’s dirty December o3 demo doesn’t readily replicate

Don’t believe everything you see

5 days ago 10 votes
o3 Is a Lying Liar

I love o3.

5 days ago 6 votes
New Results of State-of-the-art LLMs on 4 Political Orientation Tests

One model appears closer to the center than the rest

6 days ago 7 votes
You Better Mechanize

Or you had better not.

6 days ago 7 votes