Full Width [alt+shift+f] Shortcuts [alt+shift+k]
Sign Up [alt+shift+s] Log In [alt+shift+l]
1

My experience with LLM-assisted tools in software development

from ./techtipsy [alt+shift+b] in technology

It’s no secret that I was highly skeptical of LLM-s. Cool, there is this new thing that can spit out plausible text and create cheap-looking images and videos, resulting in a lot of low-quality content being shared. It was also a huge disappointment to see a human-written post that’s excellent, only for it to be cheapened with a generic AI-generated image as the cover. 1 A few years into this wild ride, I have partially changed my view because some people have figured out how to make LLM-s actually useful, and I like that part a lot. Not the part where the industry is killing my hobby and increasing energy usage worldwide, but there are some parts that I genuinely find useful. What changed? If you’re not that excited about LLM-based tools or have otherwise strong opinions on them, then please read the final words first. Background I hate the online discourse around LLM-s, or “AI”, or now that I think about it, everything. Everyone has their own opinion that they hold as absolute truth, arguments spawn from a few sentences, but nobody in the threads provide the actual context around their views and experiences, which is critical to properly understanding and arguing with a statement. This has especially been true around LLM-based tools. “I tried LLM-s, I absolutely hate it.” -> someone who used fancy autocomplete powered by one of the many Copilot-branded services and was disappointed due to hype augmenting their expectations and the result falling short of them by a large margin. “LLM-s are great and will replace engineers, it’s a game changer.” -> they vibe-coded a to-do list app over a few hours with more vulnerabilities than working features. It’s horrible in both extremes. The sad part is that I understand both perspectives. Looking at the whole situation outside in, it’s pure insanity. Sketchy financial deals, datacenter build-outs having very real environmental costs that we all pay for, supply chain crunches that are not helped by senile old men starting new...
8th Jun 2026

Stay updated

Get a weekly newsletter with the top 5 articles worth reading every week.

More from ./techtipsy

Anecdata: running shucked WD My Book/Easystore 8TB hard drives for over 5 years

Sharing a few data points because some people did not expect these drives to last that long.

a week ago • 1 votes
Trying out open weights LLM-s on hardware that I can actually afford

Seize the means of code production!

1st Sep 2026 • 1 votes
The 'free' server build

Man takes old computer, turns it into a home server again. Man happy.

9th Jul 2026 • 1 votes

More in technology

Ops needs friction

Between Microsoft's two-day outage and the FAA ground stop yesterday, there's plenty of ink spilled about who's responsible, why these things happened, etc. But it made me think back to some of the infrastructure and ops teams I've worked on, and similar (though much smaller scale) outages we encountered. Having an ops mindset is fundamentally different from a development or project management mindset. And it took me over a decade of software development to understand why.

yesterday • 1 votes
The Topology of Contemporary Politics

I’ve been getting back into the politics fandom this past month.

2 days ago • 1 votes
So all software is free as in money now?

A few weeks ago I was up late in my kitchen. I've always been a bad sleeper, starting from when I was 10 and would spend whole nights reading books and watching the clock slowly wind it way to when I had to get up and go to

2 days ago • 1 votes
Nathaniel at WordCamp Canada

Nathaniel Christopher has a lovely recap of his time at WordCamp Canada. Very cool that the dashboard widget helped connect him to the local community. Hat tip: Anne.

4 days ago • 1 votes
Our current screen time policies

Managing a house with five kids can be challenging so I like to share what’s working for us when I can. This post is how we currently handle screen time. Screens can be addictive, and it’s easy for anyone (both kids and adults) to fall into unhealthy patterns using them. Historically, I’ve been uncomfortable with screen time restrictions because I don’t want to restrict all the useful, creative, and productive opportunities that screens can provide. We’ve tried zero restrictions in the past (alongside Daily Demos as a creativity incentive), which worked ok, but at some point we wanted bit more structure. Here’s what that structure currently looks like. Device use categories For family members without phones, we have carved out the following categories of time: “Free Time” - Kids are free to do whatever activities they want (bounded only by what we’ve made available for them at the house). Video games, movies, board games, homework, run around outside, whatever. Often, this time trends towards consumption on devices, but it doesn’t have to. We call it “free time” instead of “screen time,” because we want to emphasize that the opportunities are wider than just screens. “Project Time” - Kids are encouraged to do projects, which are usually defined as creative activities of all kinds (with or without screens). This category can be blurry so we’ve often put together lists of approved project time activities, including things like: arts and crafts, coding (including “Scratch create”), playing musical instruments, recording videos, Minecraft (creative mode), the Powder Toy, Dojo Islands, and anything on Let’s Get Creative. Device-based consumption is not allowed. Offline activities are usually considered fine (reading a book, doing a puzzle, etc). “No devices” - No device use allowed. Addendum: Grant Proposals If a kid wants a one-time exception to one of the categories above, we tell them to “submit a grant proposal.” This means they need to get some paper, and write out what they want to do, and why they think it is justified. Example 1: “I want to play Minecraft creative after dinner because I am building a full-scale piano, I want to demo it tonight, and I only have 10 more minutes of work until it’s done.” Example 2: “I want to play Terraria during project time because I am making an tutorial on how to beat Moon Lord, and I need to collect screenshots from the game for my tutorial.” We usually approve grant proposals, as long as they aren’t incomplete. Schedule With these categories defined, we just need to decide how much time to allocate, and when to schedule it. For example, here’s our current “no devices” schedule: "No Devices" times Reason After Dinner Reduce stimulation before bed Sundays Protected for church and family Saturdays, before chores are done Incentivize quick completion of chores, so our Saturday afternoons remain available The categories + schedule constitutes our device policy, in addition to Daily Demos, which we continue to hold on the side. Summary Addictive device consumption can easily crowd out activities that are important long-term but deliver less dopamine short-term. Our device-time categories create a protected space for those activities on a consistent schedule that our kids can expect and make plans around. This is what works for us. Your milage may vary! Thanks for reading this post via RSS! Let me know your thoughts by leaving a comment on the original post or sending me an email.

4 days ago • 1 votes
📚 BoredReading

You seem to be enjoying this.

Join free to unlock everything.

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in