More from joshua stein
Amend 4.0 has been released: amend-4.0.sit (StuffIt 3 archive, includes source code and THINK C 5 project file) c838ee34931c00c03869affe7f9d6b85c0bbc51dd1242d11e8682a3774fdd0e3 SHA1: 040059d0b3302f1bd6ec0207b9a2f12dccdda374 Changes in this version: New repository format that tracks author e-mail in addition to name; existing repositories are migrated automatically on open Add inregrated resource file support; .rsrc files can be added directly to a repo and files are converted to DeRez-style ASCII output before diffing, so running SADerez to produce separate .r files on every change is no longer required Allow Command+. to cancel loading a repo Allow Command+. to cancel diffing; if diff text has already been output it will remain available, otherwise the window will be closed Center settings dialog, make sure author name is present Use database transactions to avoid leaving repository database files in a partially-committed state if we crash Numerous bug fixes
In 2019, I started watching Andreas Kling's programming videos, many of which were live-coding sessions writing his new operating system Serenity OS. He was always pretty fast at writing code, especially since his IDE, Qt Creator, had knowledge of all his C++ code and could auto-complete classes, variable names, and function signatures. Back then it seemed like he had much of the code written in his head and was limited just by his typing speed. Four years later, he switched to CLion which had early GitHub Copilot support for AI-assisted code completion. While initially skeptical of Copilot, he experimented with it and within months, Copilot was writing code blocks, "reading [his] mind", and writing whole functions. His IDE's auto-completion through AI seemed like it had finally caught up with his brain and he could get ideas out into code faster. While I found it fascinating watching Andreas speed up his development, none of it appealed to me for my work for years after. I didn't even use an IDE or an LSP in my editor. I was skeptical of AI and probably wrote it off too soon due to its early failures. I eventually tinkered with Claude in a web browser, asking it questions that I would have otherwise asked a search engine and been directed to a Stack Overflow answer. Once Claude Code came out, I was amazed at the power of giving it access to a directory of code on my laptop and letting it directly read and modify files. Its ability to completely (and quickly) reverse engineer a binary blob with zero context is still pretty awesome. Once local models got good and small enough, I started using Ollama on my M4 Mac Mini to do local offline work. Like many things, it's possible to like and use a technology, language, or tool while rejecting all of the hype, fraud, and negative communities that build up around them (like Rails, or Rust). Of course, you can also choose not to like or use any of those things. You can prefer to use a hand saw instead of a circular saw, or to drive a manual transmission car instead of a self-driving EV. But I think at this point it's naive to think of all AI technology as useless or bad. The AI industry on the other hand… In 2020, taking inspiration from Andreas, I started recording my own videos programming on an 8 Mhz Macintosh 512Ke (later a Macintosh Plus) in the THINK C 5 IDE. I had never actually used a classic Macintosh before and I wanted to learn what it was like to program for them as one would have 40 years ago. I made a rule for myself that I would only write code on the Macintosh itself, typing everything on its Apple M0110 keyboard. No modern computers would be involved in writing, editing, or compiling any of the code for my projects. Since starting that series, I've written (most of) an IMAP e-mail client, a revision control system, a Wikipedia reader, an IRC client, then a multi-user, multi-threaded BBS server. It all taught me a lot about the Macintosh and about C, and ignited my vintage computing hobby which has introduced me to many new friends. One thing about writing my e-mail client that bugged me was that it required a proxy server on a modern server to strip TLS and present plaintext to the poky Macintosh. So after adding Wi-Fi functionality to my Mac Plus, I added a TLS offloading device so my Mac could do TLS decryption independently. That provided the final giant piece of the puzzle needed to write a "modern" web browser (at least something newer than MacWeb that could parse HTML 5) for classic Mac OS, since everything is encrypted these days. I started working on that browser in 2024, adding other protocols such as Gopher (and begrudgingly, Gemini). A couple months ago, I was feeling particularly salty about computers and posted these notes: I have lost all enthusiasm for reading about new software projects, especially dealing with vintage computing. What would have sounded amazing a year or two ago and made me want to engage with the author, I now just assume was something AI spit out and feels hollow and boring so I skim past it. And writing software feels like being Marge in that go-kart race. Work slow and steady for a year writing something neat that had never been brought to a platform before, but someone can hear about it and use Claude to whiz by you in a week and make something with 10 times the functionality. Case in point, I saw these today: A modern web browser for Mac OS 9 with CSS, ES5 JavaScript, and TLS A 3D printer monitoring app for System 7 with video A year ago either would have sounded awesome but now I scroll past because I assume AI wrote it all Today someone posted this, a completely vibe-coded Gopher client for classic Mac OS. Claude even made a fancy website for it. And wouldn't you know it, but some of the code for it even comes from my own projects. The other week, Andreas tweeted this: Feels like “I actually enjoy writing code by hand” is about to become the big 2026 virtue signal for programmers. While I don't totally agree (and I think he's got a bit of audience capture staying on that site), it did cause me to question why I bother writing software for 40-year-old computers that only gets used by a handful of people and why I'm bothered by vibecoded software in this context. I write a lot of my software because I want it, but I'm also happy to make it for others in the community to use. Maybe I'm just being vain though, because I want my labor-of-love to be appreciated by people in the community I'm a part of and if a vibecoded version enters the chat with a ton of features and a slick interface, I'm afraid my work will get drowned out and it'll feel like a lot of wasted effort. My Comet will get Yahoo'd. So if a vibecoded tool is genuinely useful and available now while mine's been in development for years, maybe I should just be happy that other people in the community have something new to use. I can continue working on my version for myself and release it when it's ready. After all, Claude has to take that code from somewhere.
These are some notes for getting OpenBSD-current running on the Japanese-model Pomera DM250, DM250X, and DM250XY. Table of Contents Top Throat-clearing Making a backup Some DM250 hardware notes Making an OpenBSD installation SD card Installing OpenBSD Post-Installation Building a custom installation ramdisk Throat-clearing Much of my work has not yet been committed upstream so installation currently requires a custom kernel and U-Boot image which are provided here. OpenBSD support is still improving and may not be stable at any given time. Install at your own risk. These risks include: If the battery completely drains due to a software bug, the device may not power on correctly and will not be able to recharge its battery (see below). If the device cannot boot properly into U-Boot, you may need to recover it through a USB cable which may also require having to open the device (see recovery). Note: Do not use these instructions for the US-model DM250US yet. That device has a different power charging chip and keyboard layout. Making a backup This is optional but recommended. The tools and instructions at EKESETE.net should be used to make a full eMMC backup before doing anything. Some DM250 hardware notes The DM250's factory U-Boot detects Right Shift + Left Alt being pressed immediately after power-on and boots the recovery Linux kernel from its recovery_kernel partition instead of its normal kernel partition. The recovery kernel boots the initramfs image at the recovery_boot partition which mounts the SD card and executes any _sdboot.sh script found at its root directory. If you hold Shift + Alt too long at power-on, it will instead boot its graphical factory hardware test program. The recovery kernel and script do not show any output on the console while they boot and run. Hold down Right Shift + Left Alt + Power and count 3 seconds, then let go and it should boot the recovery kernel and _sdboot.sh from the SD card. Once the new U-Boot image is written to the eMMC (even before going through the OpenBSD installer), the DM250 will no longer be able to boot the original Linux kernel or recovery. You'll need to boot something via EFI to write the backup U-Boot image to eMMC to get back to the factory software. This can be done with the OpenBSD installation SD card created here by dropping to a shell. The DM250 will not fully power off with a USB-C cable connected to power (even with the factory Linux software). This means even if you halt -p and it powers itself off, it will immediately power back on. My U-Boot detects if the lid is closed when it first boots and if it's closed, it will halt the boot process so it doesn't boot into OpenBSD while it's closed on your desk trying to charge (though it will still be powered up to U-Boot). A working battery is required to be able to provide enough power even with a USB-C cable connected. If the battery is completely drained, it may not be able to boot up far enough to get to U-Boot for it to be able to tell the charging chip to go into a higher charge mode. By default it does a trickle charge but because it will always try to power on as soon as it has power connected, it may quickly drain the power it just added to the battery trying to boot. In short, don't let the battery drain completely. Making an OpenBSD installation SD card It is possible to install OpenBSD to the installation SD card and boot from it so the factory Linux software remains on the eMMC. It will run a bit slower (it runs slow even on the eMMC) and you will still need to write the new U-Boot image to eMMC, but you can easily revert back to the original U-Boot to resume booting Linux at a later time. These instructions assume you're running OpenBSD (any architecture). You'll need an SD card of a few GB, which is assumed to be sd1 here. Format an SD card with a GPT partition layout, making an EFI partition of at least 100MB and giving the rest to an OpenBSD partition. # fdisk -ygb 204800 sd1 # echo -e "a\n\n\n\n\nw\nx" | disklabel -E sd1 # newfs /dev/rsd1a # newfs_msdos /dev/rsd1i # mount /dev/sd1i /mnt U-Boot and OpenBSD will use that EFI partition as its firmware partition, but the original Pomera recovery software will see it as a normal MSDOS partition and run the /_sdboot.sh script contained on it. Fetch the standard OpenBSD armv7 EFI bootloader to the SD card's EFI partition as /efi/boot/BOOTARM.EFI. # mkdir -p /mnt/efi/boot # cd /mnt/efi/boot # ftp https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/armv7/{BOOTARM.EFI,SHA256.sig} # signify -C -x SHA256.sig BOOTARM.EFI Fetch my uboot.img to the EFI partition as /uboot.img. This U-Boot image has an embedded copy of the binary device-tree built from my Linux tree for the DM250 (JP). # cd /mnt # ftp https://jcs.org/dm250/uboot.img Fetch this installation script to the EFI partition as /_sdboot.sh. This will get executed by the factory recovery partition's boot system once the DM250 is booted into recovery mode. The script mounts the EFI partition of the SD card, backs up all of the firmware files from the eMMC to the SD card, makes a backup of the current eMMC U-Boot partition to the SD card, and then writes the new U-Boot image from the SD card to the eMMC. # ftp https://jcs.org/dm250/_sdboot.sh Switch to the OpenBSD partition of the SD card and fetch the latest OpenBSD armv7 snapshot disk images to it. # cd / # umount /mnt # mount /dev/sd1a /mnt # cd /mnt # ftp https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/armv7/{SHA256.sig,base79.tgz,comp79.tgz,game79.tgz,man79.tgz,xbase79.tgz,xfont79.tgz,xserv79.tgz,xshare79.tgz} # signify -C -x SHA256.sig *.tgz Fetch the current bwfm firmware so you can have working Wi-Fi after installation. # ftp http://firmware.openbsd.org/firmware/snapshots/{SHA256.sig,bwfm-firmware-20200316.1.3p5.tgz} # signify -C -x SHA256.sig bwfm-firmware-* Fetch my bsd.rd ramdisk image and bsd kernel. # ftp https://jcs.org/dm250/bsd{,.rd} Your SD card is now ready to go. Unmount it. # cd / # umount /mnt Installing OpenBSD Insert the prepped SD card into the DM250. If it's plugged into power, unplug it. If it's powered up, power it down. Hold down the Right Shift + Left Alt + Power buttons. As soon as the Pomera logo displays, wait about two seconds and let go. The Pomera logo will clear and the recovery kernel should now boot. It will execute the _sdboot.sh script on the SD card which will make a backup of the existing U-Boot partition to the SD card and write the new one. Nothing will be shown on the screen while it's working but it should only take about 30 seconds. Once it's done, it will reboot the device. Note that in OpenBSD, the default keyboard layout matches the Japanese keyboard on the DM250 so things like @ and * are not where they are on a US keyboard. At this point it will boot the new U-Boot with EFI support and video and keyboard drivers for the DM250. If it detected the eMMC and SD card properly, it will boot the OpenBSD EFI bootloader. No EFI variables loaded Loading Boot0000 'mmc 0' failed Booting: Label: mmc 1 Device path: /VenHw(...)/SD(1)/SD(0) disks: sd0* sd1 >> OpenBSD/armv7 BOOTARM 1.23 boot> Enter b bsd.rd to boot the installer. boot> b bsd.rd cannot open sd0a:/etc/random.seed: No such file or directory booting sd0a:bsd.rd: ... When prompted for the root disk, enter ? to see which is which. The eMMC should be sd1 showing 7.3G. Note: When installing to the eMMC, you'll need to manually setup the GPT partition table putting the EFI partition after ~16MB or so to leave room for U-Boot. This will not be needed in the future once the installer is able to recognize the DM250. Press Control + Z to get to a shell so you can manually fdisk. Use (W)hole disk or (E)dit the MBR? [whole] ^Z [1] + Suspended /install # cd /dev # sh MAKEDEV sd1 # fdisk -e -g sd1 Do you wish to write the new GPT? [n] y Writing GPT. Enter 'help' for information sd1: 1> Edit partition 0 which was auto-created, changing it to an ef partition at offset 32768 with size 8192. sd1: 1> e 0 #: type [ start: size ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0: OpenBSD [ 64: 15269791 ] Partition id ('0' to disable) [01 - FF, <uuid>]: [A6] ef Partition offset [34 - 15269854]: [64] 32768 Partition size [1 - 15237087]: [15237087] 8192 Partition name: [OpenBSD Area] EFI sd1*: 1> Now create partition 1 as an OpenBSD (a6) type with the rest of the space. sd1*: 1> e 1 #: type [ start: size ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1: Unused [ 0: 1 ] Partition id ('0' to disable) [01 - FF, <uuid>]: [00] (? for help) a6 Partition offset [34 - 15269854]: [40960] Partition size [1 - 15228895]: [15228895] Partition name: [] OpenBSD sd1*: 1> Print the table to make sure it matches, then w and q. sd1*: 1> p Disk: sd1 Usable LBA: 34 to 15269854 [15269888 Sectors] #: type [ start: size ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Free [ 34: 32734 ] 0: EFI Sys [ 32768: 8192 ] 1: OpenBSD [ 40960: 15228895 ] sd1*: 1> w Writing GPT. sd1: 1> q # Now you can return to the installer, which is asking for disk info. Enter ? to get it to refresh disk information and it should now print out sd1. Enter e to edit the GPT (again). # fg install ? Disk: sd1 Usable LBA: 34 to 15269854 [15269888 Sectors] #: type [ start: size ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Free [ 34: 32734 ] 0: EFI Sys [ 32768: 8192 ] 1: OpenBSD [ 40960: 15228895 ] Use (W)hole disk or (E)dit the GPT? [whole] e You'll now be back at fdisk, just q to quit. You can accept the auto-allocated partition layout or just make one big root and a swap partition. When prompted for the location of the sets, specify disk and then respond no that it's not mounted, and enter sd0 (the SD card), then partition a. The pathname to the sets will be just /. Continue installing, ignoring any errors from signify. The installer should automatically pick up the bwfm firmware and install it. At the end it will try to re-link the kernel which is using the upstream kernel object files, so it's important you copy the custom kernel back over /bsd. Exit to (S)hell, (H)alt or (R)eboot? [reboot] s To boot the new system, enter 'reboot' at the command prompt. # mount /dev/sd0a /mnt2 # cp /mnt2/bsd /mnt/bsd You'll also need to disable reorder_kernel which will run at each boot so it doesn't revert the kernel back to the upstream version. # mv /mnt/usr/libexec/reorder_kernel{,.disabled} # echo "#!/bin/sh" > /mnt/usr/libexec/reorder_kernel # chmod +x /mnt/usr/libexec/reorder_kernel (Note: the _ key is to the left of the up arrow, + is to the right of L.) You can now reboot. Post-Installation The first boot will report an error about bwfm and loadfirmware. You'll need to copy the firmware/nvram_ap6212a.txt file that was backed up to the SD card's EFI partition when U-Boot was flashed. # mount /dev/sd0i /mnt # cp /mnt/firmware/nvram_ap6212a.txt /etc/firmware/brcmfmac43430-sdio.rockchip,pomera-dm250.txt # umount /mnt U-Boot is compiled with boot logo support, so you can put a bitmap in the EFI partition's root directory as logo.bmp to get it to show at boot. To make it show OpenBSD puffy, you can use this image. # mount /dev/sd1i /mnt # cd /mnt # ftp https://jcs.org/dm250/logo.bmp # cd / # umount /mnt The two LEDs near the USB-C port can be addressed once booted. Create an /etc/rc.securelevel that sets them up so they are accessible from a normal kern.securelevel: # cat > /etc/rc.securelevel #!/bin/sh gpioctl -q gpio1 8 set out red_led gpioctl -q gpio1 12 set out green_led ^D # After rebooting, they can be addressed with the gpioctl utility: # gpioctl gpio1 8 1 pin 8: state 0 -> 1 Building a custom installation ramdisk If you want to tinker beyond installing, you'll need a Git clone of my OpenBSD rk3128 tree, my U-Boot pomera-dm250 tree with video and keyboard drivers, and my Linux tree which contains the DTB source files. This is optional and requires being able to compile on an armv7 machine (or cross-compile if you know how), or you can just download the latest image I've already built. Fetch an existing bsd.rd, extract its installation filesystem, build the RAMDISK kernel from my rk3128 tree, and then insert the filesystem into the new kernel. $ cd /tmp $ ftp https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/armv7/bsd.rd $ rdsetroot -x bsd.rd root.fs $ cd /usr/src/sys/arch/armv7/compile/RAMDISK $ make config $ make $ cp -f obj/bsd /tmp/bsd.rd $ rdsetroot /tmp/bsd.rd /tmp/root.fs The /tmp/bsd.rd file is now a bootable installation image with a custom kernel.
A new release of my Wallops IRC client is available: wallops-2.2.sit (StuffIt 3 archive) adc2b473664ec0960b5b028335566831dd69f4a1de40f79e22bf1337292cca88 SHA1: 603c5080c41a0d5752cae49a08376db4e18628b1 This update includes a number of new features and bugfixes: Auto-connect with the last saved settings on startup, if they are available, unless the Command key is held down Add support for sending Pushover notifications when the user's nick is mentioned or directly messaged, when a screen saver is detected to be running; sends to Pushover's API over plain-text HTTP Improve nick highlighting when the user's nick is not at the beginning of the line Speed up parsing of nicknames when joining large channels Add support for the /monitor command which is sent directly to the server Fix bug that may have caused a crash when initially connecting, and when reconnecting
More in technology
A Pika author was editing the same post in two browsers. They added six images in Browser A, then later they referenced an old tab editing the post in Browser B. That copy of the editor did not include those images. Browser B saved and removed all six images from Active Storage. A short time later, Browser A saved its newer copy of the post and put the image references back, but at that point the originally uploaded files were gone due to Browser B saving the post without the images. This exposed two separate problems: Missing images produced uncached 404 responses that the editor requested repeatedly. Action Text purged an image as soon as one save removed it from the body. Here’s how we fixed those problems. Why Action Text deleted the images Action Text keeps a rich text record’s embeds synchronized with the attachments in its body. When a submitted body no longer contains an image, Action Text removes its ActiveStorage::Attachment. Active Storage then purges the dependent blob, deleting both its database record and its file. That behavior makes sense when there is only one current copy of a document. It is unsafe when the same post can be open in multiple tabs, browsers, or devices. One stale save can delete an image that another editor is still using. Why the missing images flooded the server Browser A still had the six images in its editor, each pointing at an Active Storage redirect URL: /rails/active_storage/blobs/redirect/:signed_id/:filename Pika uses the ProseMirror-based Rhino editor. Rhino rebuilt an image’s DOM node when its caption or selection changed. Each new <img> element requested its URL again. Healthy images did not cause trouble since Active Storage makes its redirect cacheable. For a purged blob, Rails returned a 404 without Cache-Control, so the browser kept sending the request to Rails instead of reusing the failure. In a gallery, typing could re-request several missing images per keystroke. In these scenarios, this issue led to hundreds of requests hitting our servers. Fix 1: Cache permanent Active Storage 404s A purged blob’s redirect URL can never start working again. Blob IDs are not reused, and uploading the image again creates a new blob with a new signed URL. Sinc there is no concern of a 404 becoming stale, we made a specific 404 cacheable for the same period as a successful redirect: # app/controllers/concerns/active_storage_missing_blob_cache.rb module ActiveStorageMissingBlobCache extend ActiveSupport::Concern included do rescue_from ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound, with: :render_cacheable_not_found end private def render_cacheable_not_found expires_in ActiveStorage.service_urls_expire_in render file: Rails.public_path.join("404.html"), layout: false, status: :not_found end end We included the concern only in the controller serving these blob redirects: # config/initializers/active_storage_missing_blob_cache.rb Rails.application.config.to_prepare do ActiveStorage::Blobs::RedirectController.include(ActiveStorageMissingBlobCache) end (We also offered an update to Rhino that avoids it being so aggressive re-requesting images.) Fix 2: Detach dropped images instead of purging them When a save removes an image from an Action Text body, we now remove the attachment while temporarily keeping its blob. Another browser can save the image again and reattach that same blob. If nothing brings it back, a cleanup job purges it later. First, we added a timestamp for when the image was dropped: class AddDetachedAtToActiveStorageBlobs < ActiveRecord::Migration[8.1] def change add_column :active_storage_blobs, :detached_at, :datetime end end We then intercepted the private callback Active Storage uses to purge a dependent blob: # config/initializers/detach_dropped_embeds.rb module DetachDroppedEmbeds private def purge_dependent_blob if dropped_from_rich_text? blob&.update_columns(detached_at: Time.now) else super end end def dropped_from_rich_text? record.is_a?(ActionText::RichText) && !destroyed_by_association end end ActiveSupport.on_load(:active_storage_attachment) do prepend DetachDroppedEmbeds end The destroyed_by_association check preserves intentional deletion. Removing an image from a saved body detaches it, but deleting the post and its rich text still purges its images normally. Purge detached blobs after a grace period The cleanup query considers both when the blob was created and when it was detached: ActiveSupport.on_load(:active_storage_blob) do scope :unattached_since, ->(time) { unattached.where( created_at: ..time, detached_at: [nil, ..time] ) } end That scope handles both kinds of unattached blobs: A new upload that has never been attached becomes eligible based on created_at. An image removed from an old post becomes eligible based on detached_at. Pika gives both a 30-day grace period: class PurgeUnattachedUploadsJob < ApplicationJob GRACE_PERIOD = 30.days def perform ActiveStorage::Blob.unattached_since(GRACE_PERIOD.ago).find_each do |blob| blob.purge_later end end end If another browser saves the image during that period, it is attached again and the unattached scope excludes it from cleanup. The result Replaying the original two-browser edit now works safely: Browser B saves a body without the six images. The attachments are removed, but their blobs are only marked as detached. Browser A saves its newer body and reattaches the existing blobs. The images remain available and do not need to be uploaded again. If no editor brings a detached image back, the cleanup job eventually purges it. Much better! Reply by email
Yesterday, a group of MIT researchers released an article titled “Sparks of Weight-Space Programming: LLMs can natively read & write neural network weights”. The piece describes a set of experiments which convincingly show OpenAI’s latest Astra model is able to understand and successfully alter raw weight data. Wowzers! It’s a rough analogy, but an LLM’s weights are sort of like its brain. A set of weights is a large pile of numbers generated during training, and an LLM’s output is derived by running input through the weights using some matrix multiplication and a bit of randomization. While the steps to generate weights are well understood, the weights themselves are extremely opaque. There’s ongoing work to try and explain how weights work, but researchers currently have a limited understanding of what these numbers do. Based on this, I was quite surprised to learn that LLMs are able to act on raw weight data — even if it’s still just in limited cases. It’s unclear if OpenAI’s model was trained on weight data. Even if it was, I still find these results surprising. The article shows the model accurately predicting what a never-before-seen set of weights was built to do, fixing another model by updating its weights, and creating new sets of weights that performed simple tasks. I would not have guessed any of that would be possible a couple of days ago. This whole thing is slightly unnerving. The whole “weights as a black box” thing has always felt a bit sketchy to me, even when I was working with much simpler machine learning models. Now these experiments hint at a future where LLMs could be self-improving in ways that aren’t human-verifiable. Machines building machines, and we can only hope that they’re not doing anything weird. I don’t know if this strategy is scalable, but I’d guess that it’s something more people will be exploring very soon. More and more often these days, I wish we were living in less interesting times.
Harry threw me off course in episode 48 of Traction Heroes. At first, I thought was reading from a book about mind mapping. Soon, it became clear it was about something else: how to define a clear vision for a team or organization. Visions are notoriously hard to articulate. Drawing a picture — especially a picture of the whole forest, plus the trees — can help. The passage Harry read from Cameron Herold’s Vivid Vision explores this idea: So to visualize something a little more tangible, think about a tree trunk in the earth, inner core with its branches stretching out into the sky. Each of those branches contains twigs extend further out. The mind map works in a similar way, a core that branches out into smaller components. Now, apply this to the world of business. As the leader of an organization, you’re firmly planted at the center, and the various areas that contribute to the business branch out: marketing, sales, engineering, and so forth. With that in place, build off that by describing those branches in about three or four bullet points each. In other words, describe what your marketing looks like and sales and so on until you’ve captured every idea. Remember too that among the branches of your business, you want to consider every aspect of the organization: the vibe, informal codes of conduct, the fiscal environment, the scenery, all of that. Deliberately leave out numbers and data. Get a feel for the place. When you step out of your time machine three years from now and walk around the office, what’s happening? What can you say that is typical of the business three years from now? The mind map is an initial foray into the vivid vision and will act as an outline for the rough draft that you, the leader, will then write. I’ve sketched diagrams before when outlining articles, workshops, and presentations, never in service of aligning around a company’s vision. Harry’s done it several times and found it easier than trying to write it out. Seems useful — check out our conversation for more: Traction Heroes episode 48: Visions
Sharing a few data points because some people did not expect these drives to last that long.
I'm 100% for banning social media for children. I would even extend it to banning it all together in its current form. But I am also against the methods for enforcement. The problem with banning social media for one group and not another is that you have to differentiate the different groups somehow. And right now, in an age where information and personal data means everything, there are several entities that are salivating to get this data. I've written before about all the problems that come from uploading sensitive data online. It doesn't even matter if they delete the data afterward, as long as the data goes through the wire in the first place, there is a chance for a leak. What appears to be the same simple request "please verify your identity", becomes fundamentally different when mediated by technology. The question isn't whether these digital systems will be compromised, but when. And unlike that movie theater clerk who can't perfectly recall my birthdate minutes after seeing it, computers have perfect memory. They store, copy, backup, and transmit our most sensitive information through networks we don't control, to companies we've never heard of, under policies we'll never read. When kids are not allowed to use social media, it's the adult who pays the price. It's the adult who has to prove that they are not children. They have to risk uploading their government ID to a third party, or biometric data that may be saved and backed up forever. I reject this method. I also reject the method where I have to provide my age to the operating system. No system should compel me to provide personal data in order to use it. Especially if this feature is intended to provide the information to a third party. And what happens if I don't provide this information to my freebsd machine? Or worse, what if I provide false information? Am I going to get punished? How does that protect children in any way? Breaking news: Grown up arrested when OS reported forged identity in his laptop. One question I asked myself was what happens when a minor circumvents the ban. What are the consequences? At least in Australia, a country that has implemented a social media ban for those under 16, there are no consequences. The law places legal responsibility on platforms, not children or parents, and it currently applies to Facebook, Instagram, Kick, Reddit, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, Twitch, X and YouTube. This almost sounds reasonable. Why should you care, if it becomes facebook responsibility when you don't even own a facebook account? But there is always a caveat. When facebook becomes a tool your school uses to communicate with parents. When Google classroom is the service students use to do their homework. When you are required to login on a system to receive government service. You may not care about a particular social media, but they raise the bar for every other entrant in the game. Every website frequented by a large number of people inherently become social media, and demand data you didn't need to provide before. Technology is not a magical thing that can just solve every problem. It is especially weak when it comes to social problems. However, society can use technology to solve their problems. The responsibility of children falls onto their parents. And there are great tools for parents that their kids access on their devices.