Full Width [alt+shift+f] Shortcuts [alt+shift+k]
Sign Up [alt+shift+s] Log In [alt+shift+l]
41
Weekly curated resources for designers — thinkers and makers.
4 months ago

Improve your reading experience

Logged in users get linked directly to articles resulting in a better reading experience. Please login for free, it takes less than 1 minute.

More from UX Collective

No research is often better than “some” research

Weekly curated resources for designers — thinkers and makers.

4 days ago 9 votes
UX or PX? Why naming matters

Weekly curated resources for designers — thinkers and makers.

a week ago 17 votes
Cracking the code of vibe coding

Weekly curated resources for designers — thinkers and makers.

2 weeks ago 12 votes
Our human habit of anthropomorphizing everything

Weekly curated resources for designers — thinkers and makers.

3 weeks ago 15 votes
Office politics: the skill they never taught us

Weekly curated resources for designers — thinkers and makers.

a month ago 22 votes

More in design

Transforming the everyday with Edding

Showcasing how easy it is to breathe new life into home accessories with Edding spray paints. From refreshing decor to...

2 hours ago 1 votes
Ductility in Software

I learned a new word: ductile. Do you know it? I’m particularly interested in its usage in a physics/engineering setting when talking about materials. Here’s an answer on Quora to: “What is ductile?” Ductility is the ability of a material to be permanently deformed without cracking. In engineering we talk about elastic deformation as deformation which is reversed once the load is removed for example a spring, conversely plastic deformation isn’t reversed. Ductility is the amount (usually expressed as a ratio) of plastic deformation that a material can undergo before it cracks or tears. I read that and started thinking about the “ductility” of languages like HTML, CSS, and JS. Specifically: how much deformation can they undergo before breaking? HTML, for example, is famously forgiving. It can be stretched, drawn out, or deformed in a variety of ways without breaking. Take this short snippet of HTML: <!doctype html> <title>My site</title> <p>Hello world! <p>Nice to meet you That is valid HTML. But it can also be “drawn out” for readability without losing any of its meaning. It’ll still render the same in the browser: <!doctype html> <html> <head> <title>My site</title> </head> <body> <p>Hello world!</p> <p>Nice to meet you.</p> </body> </html> This capacity for the language to undergo a change in form without breaking is its “ductility”. HTML has some pull before it breaks. JS, on the other hand, doesn’t have the same kind of ductility. Forget a quotation mark and boom! Stretch it a little and it breaks. console.log('works!'); // -> works! console.log('works!); // Uncaught SyntaxError: Invalid or unexpected token I suppose some would say “this isn’t ductility, this is merely forgiving error-parsing”. Ok, sure. Nevertheless, I’m writing here because I learned this new word that has very practical meaning in another discipline to talk about the ability of materials to be stretched and deformed without breaking. I think we need more of that in software. More resiliency. More malleability. More ductility — prioritized in our materials (tools, languages, paradigms) so we can talk more about avoiding sudden failure. Email · Mastodon · Bluesky

16 hours ago 1 votes
Aila Lifestyle

Aila Lifestyle, a boutique dedicated to homeware and lifestyle objects, presents an immersive retail experience in Shuwaikh, Kuwait crafted by...

4 hours ago 1 votes
Building as gardening

Although I've never had a garden

2 days ago 5 votes
Louis Vuitton store by Peter Marino

Following a three-year renovation, the Louis Vuitton store in Milan timely reopened its doors during this year’s Salone del Mobile,...

2 days ago 2 votes