Full Width [alt+shift+f] Shortcuts [alt+shift+k]
Sign Up [alt+shift+s] Log In [alt+shift+l]
21
In terms of what physically happened, the much-publicised events in Amsterdam last week don’t amount to much.
3 months ago

Improve your reading experience

Logged in users get linked directly to articles resulting in a better reading experience. Please login for free, it takes less than 1 minute.

More from Paul Cudenec

A decade of dissent: the violence of the system

In the latest part of my retrospective essay on ten years of The Acorn, which I edit, I look back on its content in 2019.

7 hours ago 1 votes
A decade of dissent: resistance and psyops

In the latest part of my retrospective essay on ten years of The Acorn, which I edit, I look back on its content in 2018.

2 days ago 4 votes
A decade of dissent: parasites in power

In the latest part of my retrospective essay on ten years of The Acorn, which I edit, I look back on its content in 2017.

5 days ago 6 votes
A decade of dissent: against corporate dictatorship

In the second part of my retrospective essay on ten years of The Acorn, which I edit, I look back on its content in 2016.

a week ago 6 votes
A decade of dissent: enemies of progress

In the first part of a retrospective essay on ten years of The Acorn, which I edit on the Winter Oak site, I look back on its content in 2015, the year in which it was launched.

a week ago 9 votes

More in life

Hiring judgement

In the end, judgment comes first. And that means hiring is a gut decision. As much science as people want to try to pour into the hiring process, art always floats to the top. This is especially true when hiring at the executive level. The people who make the final calls — the ones who are judged on outcome, not effort — are ultimately hired based on experience and judgement. Two traits that are qualities, not quantities. They are tasked with setting direction, evaluating situations, and making decisions with limited information. All day long they are making judgment calls. That's what you hire them to do, and that's how you decide who to hire. Presented with a few finalists, you decide who you *think* will do a better job when they have to *think* about what to do in uncertain situations. This is where their experience and judgment come in. It's the only thing they have that separates them from someone else. Embrace the situation. You don't know, they don't know, everyone's guessing, some guess better than others. You can't measure how well someone's going to guess next time, you can only make assumptions based on other assumptions. Certainty is a mirage. In the art of people, everything is subjective. In the end, it's not about qualifications — it's about who you trust to make the right call when it matters most. Ultimately, the only thing that was objective was your decision. The reasons were not. -Jason

16 hours ago 4 votes
Fast Cash vs. Slow Equity

Knowing what you're building

16 hours ago 4 votes
Why Are Some Of Our Most Successful Leaders Mentally Ill?

On Milei, Musk, and Trump

4 hours ago 2 votes
Classical Music Got Invented with a Hard Kick from a Peasant's Foot

Or why we need less math in music theory

16 hours ago 2 votes
A decade of dissent: the violence of the system

In the latest part of my retrospective essay on ten years of The Acorn, which I edit, I look back on its content in 2019.

7 hours ago 1 votes