Full Width [alt+shift+f] FOCUS MODE Shortcuts [alt+shift+k]
Sign Up [alt+shift+s] Log In [alt+shift+l]
95
over a year ago

Comments

Improve your reading experience

Logged in users get linked directly to articles resulting in a better reading experience. Please login for free, it takes less than 1 minute.

More in travel

Open until 00:30 Monday-Saturday

There are several out-of-date signs around the tube network, but few this prominent. It's above the entrance to the Waterloo & City line at Waterloo station, at the foot of the ramp just before the platform. And it's been wrong for years. Waterloo and City line ↓ pandemic-related, mothballing the entire line for fifteen month, but when it reopened in June 2021 there continued to be no trains at weekends. TfL have never expressed an interest in reintroducing Saturday opening, citing data showing that passenger numbers were only ever one-sixth of a normal weekday. But they've never got round to updating the sign at the platform entrance, nor indeed the identical message above a passageway leading from the mainline station. Waterloo and City line ↓ 2013. But instead misleading information has been on display to passengers since June 2021, i.e. more than four years, until someone in the signage department finally notices and does something about it. Which may be soon or may be never.

22 hours ago 2 votes
How To Explore London

10 steps to learn the city, and its history.

12 hours ago 1 votes
Tube strike news

It's looking very likely that a four-day tube strike will start on Monday, with disruption rippling into Sunday and Friday morning. The DLR is also pencilled in for two days of concurrent disruption. strike action impact grid as seen at tube stations. Here is the diamond geezer simpler version.  SunMonTueWedThuFri    tube    (✔) ✖✖✖✖✖✖  ✔     DLR  ✔✔✖✔✖✔ "limited services running, complete your journey by 6pm" "little to no service running" "no service before 8am, normal by late morning" Last time this nearly happened, in July 2023, I wrote a post about the worst places to live during a tube strike. If your local tube station closes, who has furthest to go to find an alternative train? grey is 'over 1 mile from a non-tube station', yellow over 1½, orange over 2, red over 2½, purple over 4 (1.1 miles from Victoria). In zone 2 there are three - North Greenwich (1.3 miles from Westcombe Park), Stamford Brook (1.2 miles from South Acton) and Ravenscourt Park (1.1 miles from Shepherd's Bush). Zone 3 has nine such stations - Park Royal and Hanger Lane to the west, Neasden, Dollis Hill, Golders Green, Brent Cross, Highgate and East Finchley to the north, and Upton Park to the east. Of these East Finchley is by far the remotest, being 2.1 miles from Alexandra Palace. Metropolitan: Uxbridge (2.4 miles), Northwood (2.3), Chesham (2.2) Jubilee: Stanmore (2.3 miles) Northern: Finchley Central (2.3 miles) Central: Epping (6.1 miles), Theydon Bois (4.8), Grange Hill (3.4), Debden (3.3), Hainault (2.8), Chigwell (2.8), Fairlop (2.2) really bad places to be are Theydon Bois and Epping because TfL don't run any buses here, only trains, so with only an Oyster card you're completely cut off. • Devons Road, Bow Church, Bow Road (bugger) • Mudchute, Island Gardens • City Airport, King George V, Beckton Park, Cyprus, Gallions Reach, Beckton Crossrail and the Overground are going to be doing a lot of heavy lifting over the next week, assuming these strikes go ahead, which alas it seems they will.

14 hours ago 1 votes
Five Wonderful New Pubs That (Re)Opened In London This Year

It's not all doom and gloom in the world of boozers.

yesterday 3 votes
Æthelstan 1100

It's not every day this blog gets to celebrate an 1100th anniversary, this because not a great deal happened in the London area on verifiable dates in the 10th century. It's also not every day I get to use the Old English character Æ twenty-two times in a blogpost. King Æthelstan being crowned in Kingston, supposedly just round the back of Pret A Manger. (that's not Pret A Manager, sorry, that's Kingston Market Place) often credited as being the first King of England. He wasn't in 925 AD because England didn't yet exist, but it would two years later after Æthelstan brought together the kingdoms of Wessex and Mercia. But the proud country that now ties red crosses to lampposts has its origins on 4th September 925 when the Archbishop of Canterbury placed a crown atop Æthelstan's head, not a helmet as had been the case for all his predecessors. Edward the Elder, a ruler of Wessex who during his reign successfully took over Mercia, thereby gaining control of most of the land south of the Humber. Edward died in July 924, at which point the people of Wessex adopted his son Ælfweard as king whereas Mercia chose Æthelstan. But Ælfweard died just twelve days later (suspicious, what?), after which the people of Wessex moved to embrace Æthelstan too. (that's not a recent photo, sorry, it has Charles III coronation bunting on it) Æthelstan's coronation because it was on the boundary between the two kingdoms, technically in Wessex but within wading distance of Mercia across the Thames. It was also where his father Edward had been crowned 25 years earlier, setting a precedent that would eventually see seven Saxon Kings crowned in Kingston. Only Westminster Abbey has seen more coronations, because once that was built no monarch was ever going back to riverside Kingston again. Æthelstan was the first to decree that Kingston was a royal town, and this is why Kingston upon Thames is now one of London's three royal boroughs. wooden Saxon chapel alongside. There's no collaborating evidence that the sarsen stone was present, only that it was retrieved from the ruins of the chapel after it collapsed in 1730, and its royal heritage may simply be supposition by 18th century historians. (that's not a recent photo either, sorry, the stone's been scrubbed up since 2010) outside the town hall on the High Street, which is absolutely not where Æthelstan's coronation took place. It was moved here from the Garden of Rest in Church Street in 1936, a far more proximate location, although that was only temporary while building works on the Guildhall were completed. From 1850 to 1935 it had sat in the middle of the High Street, freshly positioned on its heptagonal base by patriotic Victorians looking to capitalise on Kingston's royal past. It had been moved here from an off-road site by the county assizes, prior to which it had been located beside the Elizabethan Market Hall and used as a mounting block, prior to which it had been in a more appropriate location outside All Saints' Church (roughly where the collapsed Saxon chapel had been). Never trust your eyes when it comes to historical locations. ♔ Edward the Elder - 8th June 900 Old English linguistic nuance. Meanwhile the coronation year appears as DCCCCXXV, whereas these days we'd probably plump for CMXXV rather than go all long-winded. I would show you that in a photograph but I don't have one, despite visiting the stone on several occasions, having seemingly never taken a single photo from the full-on Æthelstan angle. (this shot's focused on his half-brother Eadmund instead, sorry) kicking up sufficient fuss that the anniversary was imminent, or else the inexorable decay of London-based websites that used to comprehensively preview What's On in the suburbs. I only noticed when Ian Visits went to see a train. King Athelstan (not Æthelstan because presumably that was deemed too complex). The ceremony at Kingston station involved the historian Tom Holland, the local MP Sir Ed Davey and a group of Saxon reenactors from the Wychwood Warriors. Children from King Athelstan Primary School were also present, wearing cardboard crowns prominently featuring the SWR logo, which is a pretty good way to skive off lessons on only the third day of the new school year. Obviously there were iced cupcakes with an edible picture of the king on top because that's what Æthelstan would have wanted. Ian has all the photos of the event so do go and read that, especially if you prefer railways to history, and to be impressed by how a train company managed to hijack the anniversary and make it all about them on a site that wasn't where the coronation took place either. (that's just me zooming in on a previous photo, sorry) Wikipedia has you covered there, assuming your knowledge of Anglo Saxon hegemony isn't up to scratch. The country tottered somewhat after his death in 939 when the people of York plumped for Viking rule instead, but the defeat of Eric Bloodaxe under King Eadred in 954 brought the nation back together and there's been an England ever since. And it all kicked off in Kingston with the coronation of King Æthelstan 1100 years ago today, not where the Coronation Stone is and definitely not at the railway station.

2 days ago 4 votes