More from The Marginalian
“Time is a river which sweeps me along, but I am the river,” Borges wrote in his timeless “refutation” of time. “No one can build you the bridge on which you, and only you, must cross the river of life,” Nietzsche wrote a century earlier in his directive on how to find yourself. But rivers are not just metaphors for life — they are its substance and sinew. They vein this rocky planet into a living world, a world whose mind is nerved and axoned with rivers. The planetary consciousness we call civilization bloomed on their banks and went on… read article
Narrow the aperture of your attention enough to take in any one thing fully, and it becomes a portal to everything. Anneal that attention enough so that you see whatever and whoever is before you free from expectation, unfiltered through your fantasies or needs, and it becomes love. Come to see anything or anyone this clearly — a falcon, or a mountain, or a patch of moss — and you will find yourself loving the world more deeply. One winter day, walking through the placid English countryside while on pandemic-forced sabbatical from her roiling job as a foreign policy political… read article
That we will never know what it is like to be another — another person, another creature — is one of the most exasperating things in life, but also one of the most humbling, the most catalytic to our creative energies: the great calibrator of our certainties, the ultimate corrective for our self-righteousness, the reason we invented language and science and art. If there weren’t such an abyss between us and all that is not us, we never would have tried to bridge it with our microscopes and telescopes and equations seeking to know the vaster realities of nature beyond… read article
Is Peace Possible?, originally published in 1957, is the second title in Marginalian Editions. Below is my foreword to the new edition as it appears in on its pages. How ungenerous our culture has been in portraying science as cold, unfeeling, and aloof from the human sphere. No — to live a life of science is to live so wonder-smitten by reality, by the majesty and mystery of nature, that the willful destruction of any fragment of it becomes unconscionable. It is impossible to study the building blocks of life without reverence for life itself, impossible to devote one’s days… read article
More in literature
“Time is a river which sweeps me along, but I am the river,” Borges wrote in his timeless “refutation” of time. “No one can build you the bridge on which you, and only you, must cross the river of life,” Nietzsche wrote a century earlier in his directive on how to find yourself. But rivers are not just metaphors for life — they are its substance and sinew. They vein this rocky planet into a living world, a world whose mind is nerved and axoned with rivers. The planetary consciousness we call civilization bloomed on their banks and went on… read article
Some five years before his death from cancer, Clive James published the poem “Change of Domicile” in one of the lesser-known literary magazines – the British Medical Journal’s Supportive and Palliative Care, the September 2014 issue. Coincidentally, that’s the month my friend D.G. Myers died from cancer. The poem begins: “Installed in my last house, I face the thought That fairly soon there will be one house more, Lacking the pictures and the books that here Surround me with abundant evidence I spent a lifetime pampering my mind.” Sensitive readers, of course, will be offended: how morbid. Others will be riled by even a hypothetical account of an afterlife. James’ poem reminds me of the parlor game my brother and I played in hospice, shortly before cancer killed him. One of the things I miss most about him is his sense of humor. All our lives we carried on as though anything can be funny and be made fun of. That doesn’t mean we broadcasted. Gentle souls are so easily distressed. Our premise, one pondered by Egypt’s pharaohs, was simple: assuming we survive after death, what do we bring? Another way of looking at it is to ask what we would miss if we didn’t bring it. We limited the choice to inanimate objects. I’ll skip the more salacious stuff. Ken’s immediate answer was music. He was a musician and once owned enough record albums to fill half a garage – Beethoven, Schoenberg, Johnny Cash, Louis Jordan, Leon Russell, you name it — all favorites. Not surprisingly, I said books, my constant companions in life. Among the assorted torments of Hell would be the strict absence of volumes. Or an infinity of books, all written by Joyce Carol Oates. In a 1997 essay, “Nearing Ninety,” William Maxwell expressed his only regret associated with death: “[W]hen people are dead they don’t read books. This I find unbearable. No Tolstoy, no Chekhov, no Elizabeth Bowen, no Keats, no Rilke.” The last book he read, in the final months of his life, was War and Peace. When he had read a third of the book his eyesight began to fail, and the novelist Annabel Davis-Goff read the remainder of Tolstoy’s novel to him aloud. She recounts the experience in an essay collected in A William Maxwell Portrait (2004): “Reading War and Peace with Bill allowed me a rare and privileged view of how a great writer reads. I had, I suppose, known that anyone who writes above a certain level must read differently from most of us. Nabokov, in the introduction to his Lectures on Literature, asks what a reader needs in order to read a book properly. . . . His four correct answers: imagination, memory, a dictionary, and some artistic sense.”
Andrew Taylor on Charles Montagu Doughty, author of Travels in Arabia Deserta (1888): “He appealed instinctively to the past, against what he saw as the corruption of language, manners and morality of his own time, but Travels in Arabia Deserta is not backward-looking for its own sake. The achievement of the book lies in the way that language, style, rhythm and structure are all directed towards the end of accuracy in presenting landscape, characters, mood and atmosphere.” Timothy Fuller in his introduction to Michael Oakeshott on the Human Condition (Liberty Fund, 2024): “He had minimal regard for any features of modern life. The computer did not exist for him. He thought most modern inventions had done the human race little good. He wrote everything by hand. From his cottage one looked out on the country of Hardy. One felt oneself transported back before World War I, even to the nineteenth century, to a world where one might meet Jude the Obscure coming down the path. This is exactly how Oakeshott wanted to feel. Life was, to him, sweeter then.” The Taylor passage is taken from God’s Fugitive: The Life of C.M. Doughty (Dorset Press, 1999). During an electrical storm Wednesday morning we lost our internet connection and it hasn’t been restored. Possibly tonight. I wrote this on my phone. Try to ignore the irregularities. Blogger is even more intractable on a smartphone.