Full Width 
Shortcuts 
Sign Up 
Log In 
Articles 
Reading List More from Darek Kay
When I copy a browser tab URL, I often want to also keep the title. Sometimes I want to use the link as rich text (e.g., when pasting the link into OneNote or Jira). Sometimes I prefer a Markdown link. There are browser extensions to achieve this task, but I don't want to introduce potential security issues. Instead, I've written a bookmarklet based on this example extension. To use it, drag the following link onto your browser bookmarks bar: Copy Tab When you click the bookmark(let), the current page including its title will be copied into your clipboard. You don't even have to choose the output format: the link is copied both as rich text and plain text (Markdown). This works because it's possible to write multiple values into the clipboard with different content types. Here's the source code: function escapeHTML(str) { return String(str) .replace(/&/g, "&") .replace(/"/g, """) .replace(/'/g, "'") .replace(/</g, "<") .replace(/>/g, ">"); } function copyToClipboard({ url, title }) { function onCopy(event) { document.removeEventListener("copy", onCopy, true); // hide the event from the page to prevent tampering event.stopImmediatePropagation(); event.preventDefault(); const linkAsMarkdown = `[${title}](${url})`; event.clipboardData.setData("text/plain", linkAsMarkdown); const linkAsHtml = `<a href="${escapeHTML(url)}">${title}</a>` event.clipboardData.setData("text/html", linkAsHtml); } document.addEventListener("copy", onCopy, true); document.execCommand("copy"); } copyToClipboard({ url: window.location.toString(), title: document.title });
I'm a frequent user of bookmarklets. As I'm sharing some of them on my blog, I wrote this post to explain what bookmarklets are and how to use them. In short, a bookmarklet is a browser bookmark containing JavaScript code. Clicking the bookmark executes the script in the context of the current web page, allowing users to perform tasks such as modifying the appearance of a webpage or extracting information. Bookmarklets are a simpler, more lightweight alternative to browser extensions, Chrome snippets, and userscripts. How to add a bookmarklet? Here's an example to display a browser dialog with the title of the current web page: Display page title You can click the link to see what it does. To run this script on other websites, we have to save it as a bookmarklet. My preferred way is to drag the link onto the bookmarks toolbar: A link on a web page is dragged and dropped onto a browser bookmark bar. A bookmark creation dialog appears. The prompt is confirmed and closed. The created bookmarklet is clicked. The current web page title is displayed in a browser dialog. Another way is to right-click the link to open its context menu: In Firefox, you can then select "Bookmark Link…". Other browsers make it a little more difficult: select "Copy Link (Address)", manually create a new bookmark, and then paste the copied URL as the link target. Once created, you can click the bookmark(let) on any web page to display its title. Scroll further down to see more useful use cases. How to write a bookmarklet? Let's start with the code for the previous bookmarklet example: window.alert(document.title) To turn that script into a bookmarklet, we have to put javascript: in front of it: javascript:window.alert(document.title) To keep our code self-contained, we should wrap it with an IIFE (immediately invoked function expression): javascript:(() => { window.alert(document.title) })() Finally, you might have to URL-encode your bookmarklet if you get issues with special characters: javascript:%28%28%29%20%3D%3E%20%7B%0A%20%20window.alert%28document.title%29%0A%7D%29%28%29 Useful bookmarklets Here are some bookmarklets I've created: Debugger — Starts the browser DevTools debugger after 3 seconds, useful for debugging dynamic content changes. Log Focus Changes — Logs DOM elements when the focus changes. Design Mode — Makes the web page content-editable (toggle).
It can be frustrating to fill out a web form, only to accidentally refresh the page (or click "back") and lose all the hard work. In this blog post, I present a method to retain form data when the page is reloaded, which improves the user experience. Browser behavior Most browsers provide an autofill feature. In the example form below, enter anything into the input field. Then, try out the following: Click the "Example link" and use the "back" functionality of your browser. Reload the page. Query Example link Depending on your browser, the input value might be restored: Browser Reload Back Firefox 130 Yes Yes Chrome 129 No Yes Safari 18 No Yes How does it work? I was surprised to learn that this autofill behavior is controlled via the autocomplete, that is mostly used for value autocompletion from past web forms. However, if we disable the autocompletion, the autofill feature will be disabled as well: <input autocomplete="false" /> To learn more about the behavior, read the full spec on persisted history entry state. Preserving application state Even with autofill, no browser will restore dynamic changes previously triggered by the user. In the following example, the user has to always press the "Search" button to view the results: This is an interactive example. Please enable JavaScript to use it. Query Search ... const inputElementNative = document.querySelector("#example-search-input"); const outputElementNative = document.querySelector("#example-search-output"); const performSearch_exampleSearch = (outputElement) => { outputElement.innerText = ""; const introText = document.createTextNode("Open the result for "); outputElement.appendChild(introText); const link = document.createElement("a"); link.href = "https://example.com"; link.innerText = inputElementNative.value || "no text"; outputElement.appendChild(link); }; document.querySelector("#example-search-form").addEventListener("submit", (event) => { event.preventDefault(); performSearch_exampleSearch(outputElementNative); }, ); If the web page changes its content after user interaction, it might be a good idea to restore the UI state after the page has been refreshed. For example, it's useful to restore previous search results for an on-site search. Note that Chrome will fire a change event on inputs, but this is considered a bug as the respective spec has been updated. Storing form values As the form value might be lost on reload, we need to store it temporarily. Some common places to store data include local storage, session storage, cookies, query parameters or hash. They all come with drawbacks for our use case, though. Instead, I suggest using the browser history state, which has several advantages: We get data separation between multiple browser tabs with no additional effort. The data is automatically cleaned up when the browser tab is closed. We don't pollute the URL and prevent page reloads. Let's store the search input value as query: document.querySelector("form").addEventListener("submit", (event) => { event.preventDefault(); const inputElement = document.querySelector("input"); history.replaceState({ query: inputElement.value }, ""); performSearch(); }); This example uses the submit event to store the data, which fits our "search" use case. In a regular form, using the input change event might be a better trigger to store form values. Using replaceState over pushState will ensure that no unnecessary history entry is created. Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'replaceState' on 'History': 2 arguments required, but only 1 present. Restoring form values My first approach to restore form values was to listen to the pageshow event. Once it's fired, we can access the page load type from window.performance: window.addEventListener("pageshow", () => { const type = window.performance.getEntriesByType("navigation")[0].type; const query = history.state?.query; if (query && (type === "back_forward" || type === "reload")) { document.querySelector("#my-input").value = query; performSearch(); } }); I will keep the solution here in case someone needs it, but usually it is unnecessary to check the page load type. Because the history state is only set after the search form has been submitted, we can check the state directly: const query = history.state?.query; if (query) { document.querySelector("#my-input").value = query; performSearch(); } Demo Here's an example combining both techniques to store and restore the input value: This is an interactive example. Please enable JavaScript to use it. Query Search ... const inputElementCustom = document.querySelector("#example-preserve-input"); const outputElementCustom = document.querySelector("#example-preserve-output"); const performSearch_examplePreserve = (outputElement) => { outputElement.innerText = ""; const introText = document.createTextNode("Open the result for "); outputElement.appendChild(introText); const link = document.createElement("a"); link.href = "https://example.com"; link.innerText = inputElementCustom.value || "no text"; outputElement.appendChild(link); }; document.querySelector("#example-preserve-form").addEventListener("submit", (event) => { event.preventDefault(); performSearch_examplePreserve(outputElementCustom); history.replaceState({ query: inputElementCustom.value }, ""); }); const historyQuery = history.state?.query; if (historyQuery) { document.querySelector("#example-preserve-input").value = historyQuery; performSearch_examplePreserve(outputElementCustom); } Conclusion Preserving form data on page refresh is a small but impactful way to improve user satisfaction. The default browser autofill feature handles only basic use cases, so ideally we should maintain the form state ourselves. In this blog post, I've explained how to use the browser history state to temporarily store and retrieve form values.
In this post, I will summarize some problems and constraints that I've encountered with the Notifications and Push web APIs. Notification settings on macOS Someone who's definitely not me wasted half an hour wondering why triggered notifications would not appear. On macOS, make sure to enable system notifications for your browsers. Open "System Settings" → "Notifications". For each browser, select "Allow notifications" and set the appearance to "Alerts": Onchange listener not called Web APIs offer a way to subscribe to change events. This is especially useful in React: navigator.permissions .query({ name: "push", userVisibleOnly: true }) .then((status) => { status.onchange = function () { // synchronize permission status with local state setNotificationPermission(this.state); }; }); Whenever the notification permission changes (either through our application logic or via browser controls), we can synchronize the UI in real-time according to the current permission value (prompt, denied or granted). However, due to a Firefox bug, the event listener callback is never called. This means that we can't react to permission changes via browser controls in Firefox. That's especially unfortunate when combined with push messages, where we want to subscribe the user once they grant the notification permission. One workaround is to check at page load if the notification permission is granted with no valid subscription and resubscribe the user. Notification image not supported Browser notifications support an optional image property. This property is marked as "experimental", so it's not surprising that some browsers (Firefox, Safari) don't support it. There is an open feature request to add support in Firefox, but it has been open since 2019. VAPID contact information required When sending a push message, we have to provide VAPID parameters (e.g. the public and private key). According to the specification, the sub property (contact email or link) is optional: If the application server wishes to provide, the JWT MAY include a "sub" (Subject) claim. Despite this specification, the Mozilla push message server will return an error if the subject is missing: 401 Unauthorized for (...) and subscription https://updates.push.services.mozilla.com/wpush/v2/… You might not encounter this issue when using the popular web-push npm package, as its API encourages you to provide the subject as the first parameter: webpush.setVapidDetails("[email protected]", publicKey, privateKey); However, in the webpush-java library, you need to set the subject explicitly: builder.subject("[email protected]"); There is an open issue with more information about this problem. Microsoft Edge pitfalls Microsoft introduced adaptive notification requests in the Edge browser. It is a crowdsourced score system, which may auto-accept or auto-reject notification requests. The behavior can be changed in the Edge notification settings. Additionally, on a business or school device, those settings might be fixed, displaying the following tooltip: This setting is managed by your organization.
More in programming
I’ve been taking a break from Mastodon as my social home on the web for about six weeks. It has been more difficult than I’d usually admit. I have an amazing local community in my town that I love and am deeply involved in. But nobody here is a programmer, or even a computer nerd, so it doesn’t serve my need for a tech community. I work alone, for myself, in my house. It’s a fortunate lifestyle with many upsides, but it means I don’t get that form of community at work, either. I’ve had this feeling before… as a teenager in the 1990s. It’s profoundly lonely. But when I got internet access, that started to change. I found my people. First in the Total Annihilation community (RIP, Annihilated), then the HardOCP Forum, then the Something Awful Forums, then Tumblr, then Twitter and our community of Apple bloggers, and then Mastodon. Communities form, change, and dissolve over time. None of those are, today, anything like what they were when I most enjoyed them. We change, too. I didn’t move on from most of those solely because they changed — it was usually because we both changed, and it was no longer a good fit. My break from Mastodon has been a relief in some ways, as I’ve felt increasing divergence between what I wanted and what I was getting from it, but I didn’t know where else to go. Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube are all more video-broadcast platforms than communities. All I’ve found on Bluesky is even more anger and politics, the last things I need or want. Threads hasn’t yet stuck for me, and it’s owned by an asshole. Twitter was an amazing product and community that was previously owned by assholes, and now it’s X, which has a strong but different tech community, and is owned by different assholes. So I’ve just been… nowhere, for the first time since the 1990s. It has been, once again, quite lonely. Sure, it’s been relaxing, too, but in the way a vacation is relaxing. It’s great to take breaks, but after a long vacation, I’m ready to turn my brain back on. Without participating in a large, broad tech community, I’m exposed to fewer new ideas, both of my main jobs (app development and podcasting) are much harder, the quality and reach of my work have suffered, my skills aren’t improving as much, my mind is less stimulated, and I feel disconnected from my professions and passions. My world has gotten smaller. I could keep going like this to prove a stubborn victory or purity test, but I’d mostly just be hurting myself. Communities change, conditions change, and we change. We’re all better off if we’re willing to change our minds, and if our communities let us, no matter how strongly our younger selves declared a previous position. So I’m going to wade back in and see how it goes, trying to find a better balance to hopefully have better results, including on Mastodon. My people are spread across multiple services, and I’m going to explore them all, despite most of them being owned by assholes. I’d love to participate in communities without any assholes benefiting from it, but in the modern world, that simply isn’t possible. The only alternative is to isolate myself and not have a community at all (or a job, or a smartphone, or a computer, or internet access, or a car, or most of my food, or my country). That’s neither a price I’m willing to pay nor a condition I’d try to impose on anyone else. I’d love to have your support, forgiveness, and grace as I try to find my people again, and I strive to offer the same to all of you. Everyone deserves to be part of a community. And as I grow, I’m learning to declare fewer absolutes in a complex, imperfect, and constantly changing world.
My now-traditional “summary” of the conference along with my own commentary and thoughts.
Every year, browser vendors collaborate via the Interop project to synchronize their efforts on new HTML/CSS/JS features. This year, there’s a ton of super exciting features being considered! In this blog post, we’ll explore the CSS of the future, to get a glimpse of what we’ll soon be able to do.
Imprint’s average engineer is merging 4x more PRs than 2 years ago. Yay. Aggregated behind the average is something even more interesting: we have two teams that are merging 10x their PRs over that period. One engineer is merging 25x the PRs per week of our average engineer two years ago, and a number are merging 10x. That’s pretty neat, and the slope of the line suggests our average in a year is going to look much closer to today’s p90 than today’s p50. Even more importantly, we aren’t just shipping more, our quality has improved: incidents are down 42% half-over-half, and critical incidents are down 78% half-over-half. I think we’ve always known the quality/velocity tradeoff wasn’t a particularly useful construct, but that’s undeniable today. As we’ve walked this path, we–like everyone else progressing down it–have run into the problem of pull request review. The p50 pull request review took about 33 minutes to complete 2 years ago, but now takes us about 77 minutes. The slope here correlates tightly with the number of pull requests getting merged. Tightly enough that addressing it became one of my priorities for the week. We solved it! Just kidding, we’ve absolutely not solved it, but I think our current approach is an interesting one, which we call the small-change. The work discussed here was shaped and done by many folks at Imprint including Dan, Joy, Daniel, Lenny, Taylor, Ted, and Annie, among many others. Why review pull requests? There are four reasons we review pull requests: Knowledge sharing between author and reviewer – software engineering is generally learned via apprenticeship, and reviews are a primary mechanism of experienced engineers teaching others what good software looks like. We believe the current volume means that this knowledge sharing will have to move towards operating on clusters of pull requests, rather than individual pull requests Preventing errors – review has always been an expensive time to catch errors, and we believe that effective CICD along with harness verification techniques like poteto’s pstack are more effective mechanisms for preventing errors than review Preventing malicious behavior – my experience is that even careful code review will generally miss competent malicious behavior, although fortunately most malicious behavior is incompetent. We believe both sorts of behavior are best identified using a combination of fixed rules (modifying these specific objects/classes/files requires review), anti-abuse mechanisms that we’ve refined in our LLM-based member support experiences, auditing, and audit log inspection Compliance obligations in our documented controls – these can be changed, but today they require that an independent human reviews changes in a subset of our repositories In the modern development paradigm, we think there is a better solution for each of these problems. But, we also want to make these changes very cautiously. Small steps with small-change We believe we move fast by finding narrow, contained ways to validate new practices, so to iterate our way into an effective solution, we’ve developed the concept of a small-change. Here’s how it works: When a pull request is marked ready, CICD determines whether it is eligible to be a small-change. This is represented as a passing Github check. There is also a label for visibility, but it is the check itself, managed by the build and not human modifiable, that determines eligibility. (The label is used for initial filtering, but the check is still independently verified.) Something is a small-change if it meets all of these criteria: It is less than 1,000 lines of code There are no p1 or p2 findings from our ai-code-review automated review bot The author has “experience” in the service or application, defined as 10+ prior merged pull requests into that service or application’s directories. For changes working across multiple services or applications, the author must have experience in all of them to qualify Impacts fewer than N distinct services or applications. N is 1 on our frontend monorepo, and N is 3 in our backend monorepo, where typical changes will modify both a gRPC service and a common HTTP gateway Shared libraries and utilities files are not eligible for small-change Each repository has a .small_change file which allows per-path customization while we continue to tune the behaviors. For example, a service dealing with money movement can be excluded Our Slack automation tags every reference to a pull request with reacji labeling the state of that pull request, for example if it has failing tests, if it has been approved but tests are still running, or if it is ready to merge. We added a small-change reacji that indicates which of those pull requests meet the small-change criteria In our internal skills repository, we created two skills that have been distributed across harnesses: review-small-change which takes a list of repositories and reviews all open, non-draft, small-changes, including providing approval if they meet the review’s criteria (all checks pass including small-change check, and not touching on sensitive topics such as payments and security) review-pr-cluster which reviews batches of pull requests to identify common themes that came up, and suggest opportunities for discussion and adding verifications We set the social expectation that any error caused by a small-change is a failure in our system, and has to be solved at the system level: improvements to ai-code-review, to our verification mechanisms, to our CICD, to our harness, etc. This took about two days of infrequent attention to implement and rollout, although I imagine we will be tuning the knobs here for a long time. Maybe forever. fleet: centrally orchestrated harness I’ll briefly mention our other approach to reducing code review volume, which anchors on our centrally-orchestrated harness, fleet. (Which is similar to Stripe’s Minions although not following the one-shot approach in particular). We rely on fleet to implement and verify software in a highly controlled harness running in the cloud, with independent evaluation mechanisms to identify the correct number of independent reviewers for any given change. That number can be as low as one (e.g. fleet writes, one human reviews) for changes evaluated as safe. Results / next steps / reception I’ll be honest, it’s too early to give a useful result here. From early results, about 10% of changes qualify as a small-change. Those are now eligible for very fast approval, and generally get it unless they trip a flag, generally due to touching a security or money adjacent topic. While 10% is a small percentage, the core concept here is working, and ultimately will succeed or fail based on our ability to expand that percentage over the next few months in tandem with expanding our verification mechanisms to be increasingly comprehensive. This is ultimately going to fail or succeed depending on our ability to improve our verifications, which does require more difficult sorts of techniques to accomplish in low scale-complexity, high domain-complexity software than in the high scale-complexity, low domain-complexity products where many techniques like incremental rollouts are exceptionally effective. (Don’t get me wrong, they still work, they just provide less coverage when most users have different configuration and behavior.) Folks have not been uniformly excited about this, it’s a substantial change from how we’ve learned to be good engineers, and it’s uncomfortable to reevaluate whether a long-held best practice has become merely dogma. The most energizing part of the current cycle is that we get to reevaluate these practices we grew up on every week; the most painful part of the current cycle is that we’re likely to fall behind if we ever stop reevaluating them.
