More from Tikalon Blog by Dev Gualtieri
Tikalon Blog is now in archive mode. Here's a directory of links to easily printed and saved articles. If you're willing to wait a while for the download, a zip file of all the blog articles can be found at the link below. Note, however, that these articles are copyrighted and can't be used to train artificial intelligent agents. Individuals are free to republish single articles on their personal websites.
Microphones convert sound into an electrical signal for subsequent amplification, as in auditorium public address systems; or transmission, as in landline and mobile phones. The most common types of microphones are carbon, used in early telephones, condenser, electret, dynamic, ribbon, crystal and MEMS. All these microphones operate as transducers that convert sound pressure into an electrical signal. This makes them also sensitive to noise caused by air molecules bouncing against their diaphragms. In an effort to solve this thermal noise problem, a team of mechanical engineers has investigated a sound sensing approach that uses viscous air flow rather than sound pressure. Viscous flow is what vibrates spiderwebs in gentle breezes. Air flow passing a thread of a spiderweb drags the thread. They demonstrated sound detection by a simulated spiderweb, an array of thin cantilever beams. The beams were 0.5 micrometer thick silicon nitride placed over a hole in a silicon wafer, and a laser was used to measure the displacement of the microbeams, first in response to thermal noise, and then in response to sound waves from 100 to 1000 Hz. The cantilever velocity matched that of the sound wave, irrespective of the length or width of the beam. The demonstrated cantilever microphone is about 50 dBa less sensitive than the best pressure-based microphones; but, pressure microphones have been perfected over a span of 150 years. As the lead author of the paper comments, "Detecting air flow as a way to sense sound has largely been ignored by researchers, but the principles show that it's worth considering."
"Form follows function" is a maxim that an object's shape and appearance should be defined only by its purpose or function. A quick perusal of any antique shop will show that this maxim is generally ignored. Humans (Homo sapiens) have been called "naked apes," but we and our close species cousins quickly adopted the concept of wearing the fur skins of animals for protection. Our ancestors were likely much more interested in how they would obtain their next meal than how stylish they appeared in hyena fur. As human culture progressed, people desired to distinguish themselves from others; and, what could be an easier way to do that than through dress. This is accomplished by the simple technique of dyeing drab natural fibers, but the simple sewing needle is a technical innovation that's lead to a means of producing more ornate dress. A recent open access article in Science Advances investigates the use of delicate eyed needles in the Paleolithic as the means for producing refined, ornamented dress. One argument for clothing's becoming a means of decoration is that traditional body decoration, such as body painting with ochre, weren't effective in cold climates, since clothing was needed all the time for survival. Homo sapiens arrived in Europe at around 45,000 BC, and the earliest known eyed needles appeared in Siberia around 40,000 BC, in the Caucasus around 38,000 BC, in West Asia around 30,000 BC, and in Europe around 26,000 BC. Clothing the human body regardless of climate is a social practice that's persisted to this day. The eyed needle combined the processes of hole puncture and threading to allow finer and more efficient sewing.
Deep thought is what distinguishes humans from other animals. The brain is the medium for thought; so, there's the idea that brain size is important, with larger brains allowing more profound thought. Larger brains in hominids appears to have an evolutionary advantage, but the largest animals do not have proportionally larger brains. For the last century, conventional wisdom was that body mass in mammals could be described by a power law. A British research team has created a large dataset of brain and body sizes from about 1,500 species to determine the trend in brain size evolution, finding that the trend is brain size and body mass is not log-linear, but rather log-curvilinear, plateauing at high body mass. The research team found that all groups of mammals demonstrated rapid bursts of evolutionary change, not only towards larger brain size, but smaller as well. Bats very rapidly reduced their brain size, suggesting that flight may have imposed an evolutionary constraint. Homo sapiens has evolved more than twenty times faster than all other mammalian species, resulting in the massive brain size of modern man. Primates, rodents, and carnivores show a tendency for increase in relative brain size as they evolved. It appears that there is something preventing brains from getting too big, perhaps because big brains beyond a certain size are simply too costly to maintain. This upper limit of brain size applies to animals with very different biology.
In today's bigger is better world, you don't order a large coffee, you order a 20 fluid ounce Venti coffee. From 1987 through 2004, McDonald's restaurants had a supersize option for larger than large portions of its French fries and soft drinks. The prefix, super, has been used to describe supercooling, the unexpected cooling without a phase change when liquids can be cooled below their freezing points without solidifying. Water has many unusual properties, and these are most probably the result of water molecule being small, and the force holding these molecules together in a liquid or solid arising from hydrogen bonding. Supercooled water is a hazard to aviation, since supercooled water droplets often existing in cumulus and stratus clouds will instantly freeze on aircraft surfaces and plug the Pitot tubes that indicate airspeed. It's easy to create supercooled water in the laboratory. You just need to purify the water to remove contained minerals. The mineral crystals act as nucleation sites. Bacteria and fungi are efficient natural ice nucleators because of the way their proteins act as ice templates. The best such natural ice nucleators the Pseudomonas syringae bacterium, which is used to make artificial snow. Larger protein molecules are usually better at ice nucleation, but small fungal proteins are good at ice nucleation when they clump into larger aggregates. Scientists at the University of Utah have developed a model for prediction of the nucleation temperature of ice on a given surface. Model parameters include the shapes of surface defects, and appropriately sized and shaped surface bumps and depressions can squeeze water molecules into configurations that make it easier or harder for ice to form.
More in science
In math and computer science, researchers have long understood that some questions are fundamentally unanswerable. Now physicists are exploring how even ordinary physical systems put hard limits on what we can predict, even in principle. The post ‘Next-Level’ Chaos Traces the True Limit of Predictability first appeared on Quanta Magazine
The Magic Development of Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and China, and What That Tells Us about US Tariffs, China’s Future, EU Protectionism, Japan’s Zombie Debt, Argentina’s Arrested Development, and more
Non-blog life has been very busy, and events have been changing rapidly, but I thought it would be a good idea to give a brief bulleted list of updates regarding the NSF and associated issues: A court decision regarding who has the authority to fire probationary federal workers has led to the NSF hiring back 84 of the employees that it had previously dismissed, at least for now. The Office of Personnel Management is still altering their wording on this. There is likely some kind of continuing resolution in the offing in Congress, as the current funding stopgap expires on March 14. If a CR passes that extends to the rest of the fiscal year (Sept 30), that would stave off any big cuts until next FY's budget. At the same time, a number of NSF-funded research experience for undergraduate programs are being cancelled for this year. This is very unfortunate, as REU programs are many undergrads' first exposure to real research, while also being a critical mechanism for students at non-research-heavy institutions to get research experience. The concerns about next year's funding are real. As I've written before, cuts and programmatic changes have been proposed by past presidents (including this one in his first term), but historically Congressional appropriators have tended not to follow those. It seems very likely that the White House's budget proposal will be very bleak for science. The big question is the degree to which Congress will ignore that. In addition to the budget, agencies (including NSF) have been ordered to prepare plans for reductions in force - staffing cuts - with deadlines to prepare those plans by 13 March and another set of plans by 14 April. Because of all this, a number of universities are cutting back on doctoral program admissions (either in specific departments or more broadly). My sense is that universities with very large components of NIH funding thanks to medical schools are being particularly cautious. Schools are being careful because many places guarantee some amount of support for at least several years, and it's difficult for them to be full-speed-ahead given uncertainties in federal sponsor budgets, possible endowment taxes, possible revisions to indirect cost policies, etc. Enormous uncertainty remains in the wake of all of this activity, and this period of comparative quiet before the staffing plans and CR are due is an eerie calm. (Reminds me of the line from here, about how it can be unsettling when a day goes by and you don't hear anything about the horse loose in the hospital.) In other news, there is a national Stand Up for Science set of rallies tomorrow. Hopefully the net impact of this will be positive. The public and our legislators need to understand that support for basic science is not a partisan issue and has been the underpinning of enormous economic and technological progress.
In 2006 (yes, it was that long ago – yikes) the International Astronomical Union (IAU) officially adopted the definition of dwarf planet – they are large enough for their gravity to pull themselves into a sphere, they orbit the sun and not another larger body, but they don’t gravitationally dominate their orbit. That last criterion […] The post Where Are All the Dwarf Planets? first appeared on NeuroLogica Blog.
And all the different ways you can “train” a model