More from Tikalon Blog by Dev Gualtieri
"Form follows function" is a maxim that an object's shape and appearance should be defined only by its purpose or function. A quick perusal of any antique shop will show that this maxim is generally ignored. Humans (Homo sapiens) have been called "naked apes," but we and our close species cousins quickly adopted the concept of wearing the fur skins of animals for protection. Our ancestors were likely much more interested in how they would obtain their next meal than how stylish they appeared in hyena fur. As human culture progressed, people desired to distinguish themselves from others; and, what could be an easier way to do that than through dress. This is accomplished by the simple technique of dyeing drab natural fibers, but the simple sewing needle is a technical innovation that's lead to a means of producing more ornate dress. A recent open access article in Science Advances investigates the use of delicate eyed needles in the Paleolithic as the means for producing refined, ornamented dress. One argument for clothing's becoming a means of decoration is that traditional body decoration, such as body painting with ochre, weren't effective in cold climates, since clothing was needed all the time for survival. Homo sapiens arrived in Europe at around 45,000 BC, and the earliest known eyed needles appeared in Siberia around 40,000 BC, in the Caucasus around 38,000 BC, in West Asia around 30,000 BC, and in Europe around 26,000 BC. Clothing the human body regardless of climate is a social practice that's persisted to this day. The eyed needle combined the processes of hole puncture and threading to allow finer and more efficient sewing.
The United States Department of Energy has updated its list of critically important materials. The current list of 54 materials includes elements that are presently critical to a transition to green energy, such as the rare earth elements important to turbine generators, and electric vehicle motors; and, lithium for storage batteries. Also included on the list is copper, an element historically so inexpensive and plentiful that it was used as the material for the United States one cent piece. However copper's price eventually increased to the point at which the material composition of this coin was changed in 1982 from being 95% copper to copper-plated zinc with just 2.5% copper. The price of copper has skyrocketed in the 21st century to nearly 15 times its 1960 price. A recent report concludes that copper can't be mined fast enough to satisfy market demand for green energy technology. A standard Honda Accord needs about 40 pounds of copper, but a fully electric version of that same car needs nearly 200 pounds of copper. Upgrades to the electric grid infrastructure depend on copper. An onshore wind turbine has about 10 tons of copper, and offshore wind turbines need more than twice that amount. The study calls into question the presumption that the copper needed for the green energy transition will somehow be available. A production model found that copper can't be mined rapidly enough to satisfy the government roadmap for green energy. For complete electrification of the world's vehicle fleet, about six new large copper mines would need to start production annually through 2050. The average time between discovery of a new copper mineral deposit and getting a permit to mine is about 20 years.
There have been many studies using scientific instrumentation, mostly gas chromatography, in attempts to find what distinguishes a superb wine from an inexpensive house wine. A typical wine can contain more than 800 different aroma compounds. One study examined two Australian red wines in an attempt to synthetically recreate the aroma of these wines. It was found that only about 50 aroma compounds could be detectable by smell, a minimum of 44 compounds were necessary to approximate the smell, and that certain compounds had a major affect on the final aroma. Artificial intelligence has been applied to determination of where grapes were grown. An artificial intelligence analysis of chromatograms from 80 red wines from 12 vintages in the years 1990-2007 across seven Bordeaux estates showed that the estate could be identified perfectly, and the vintage with up to 50% accuracy. Each estate possessed an unique chemical signature, and the method would be an effective way to combat wine counterfeiting. A similar study was done for beer, with artificial intelligence predicting how a particular beer will be rated by consumers, and what aroma compounds can be added to improve it. Beer is one product that can be improved by modification, since it has thousands of flavor compounds derived by a mix of raw materials consisting of malt, yeast, hops, water and spices, and their evolution through biochemical conversions during brewing consisting of kilning, mashing, boiling, fermentation, maturation and aging. The study examined more than 200 chemical properties of 250 commercial beers over 22 beer styles. There was a definite preference for high ethanol and high caloric value. The beer research team's future goal is making better alcohol-free beer.
More in science
This blog has moved to https://blog.caseyhandmer.com/?moved. All the old posts are there, with interactive versions of many of the charts. The RSS feed is now https://blog.caseyhandmer.com/feed.xml. This site stays up for old links but won’t get new posts.
There’s a famous (but unattributable) quip that goes something like this: If you are not a liberal at 25, you have no heart. If you are not a conservative at 35, you have no brain. In Chapter 12 of Probably Overthinking It, I used data from the General Social Survey (GSS) to show that the quip is half right. Older people hold more conservative views. But as people get older, their views don’t become more conservative; on average, they become... Read More Read More The post Do People Get More Conservative With Age? appeared first on Probably Overthinking It.
Like some of you, we have several kitchen appliances with integrated digital timers.
In this conversation, Blaise Agüera y Arcas and Baratunde Thurston explored what a story of symbiosis and interdependence might teach us about living alongside AI. Agüera y Arcas began by calling individual human intelligence a myth: we’ve always been a collective intelligence, entwined with our technologies. He traced this back to symbiogenesis. Life has grown more complex not by splitting apart but by merging, as separate organisms fuse into increasingly complex new forms of life. These mergers speed up change by opening new possibilities. Thurston agreed that union is in our nature but framed the current technological acceleration as a speed problem. We need time and new stories to adjust because, as he reminded us, “when you invent the ship, you invent the shipwreck.” Caring for one another through acceleration must be our prime directive, he said. The two then turned to how we relate to AI. Responding to Joanna Bryson’s argument that robots should be our slaves, Thurston said the master is also in chains — owning another dehumanizes the owner. As relational beings, how we treat AI will shape how we treat each other. Thurston called for both an expansion and a humbling of how we define ourselves: “We’ve overdone independence,” he said, “interdependence makes us richer.” Agüera y Arcas agreed and pushed us to drop a zero-sum definition of human intelligence, where every AI advance diminishes humanity’s value. As technology advances, we trade some individual skills for new collective capabilities, Agüera y Arcas acknowledged. But over the long arc of history, he believes, that exchange pays off in collective flourishing. Thurston didn’t deny this, but he closed with an urgent question: who controls the loss of capabilities and agency?