Tikalon Blog is now in archive mode. Here's a directory of links to easily printed and saved articles. If you're willing to wait a while for the download, a zip file of all the blog articles can be found at the link below. Note, however, that these articles are copyrighted and can't be used to train artificial intelligent agents. Individuals are free to republish single articles on their personal websites.

Microphones convert sound into an electrical signal for subsequent amplification, as in auditorium public address systems; or transmission, as in landline and mobile phones. The most common types of microphones are carbon, used in early telephones, condenser, electret, dynamic, ribbon, crystal and MEMS. All these microphones operate as transducers that convert sound pressure into an electrical signal. This makes them also sensitive to noise caused by air molecules bouncing against their diaphragms. In an effort to solve this thermal noise problem, a team of mechanical engineers has investigated a sound sensing approach that uses viscous air flow rather than sound pressure. Viscous flow is what vibrates spiderwebs in gentle breezes. Air flow passing a thread of a spiderweb drags the thread. They demonstrated sound detection by a simulated spiderweb, an array of thin cantilever beams. The beams were 0.5 micrometer thick silicon nitride placed over a hole in a silicon wafer, and a laser was used to measure the displacement of the microbeams, first in response to thermal noise, and then in response to sound waves from 100 to 1000 Hz. The cantilever velocity matched that of the sound wave, irrespective of the length or width of the beam. The demonstrated cantilever microphone is about 50 dBa less sensitive than the best pressure-based microphones; but, pressure microphones have been perfected over a span of 150 years. As the lead author of the paper comments, "Detecting air flow as a way to sense sound has largely been ignored by researchers, but the principles show that it's worth considering."

"Form follows function" is a maxim that an object's shape and appearance should be defined only by its purpose or function. A quick perusal of any antique shop will show that this maxim is generally ignored. Humans (Homo sapiens) have been called "naked apes," but we and our close species cousins quickly adopted the concept of wearing the fur skins of animals for protection. Our ancestors were likely much more interested in how they would obtain their next meal than how stylish they appeared in hyena fur. As human culture progressed, people desired to distinguish themselves from others; and, what could be an easier way to do that than through dress. This is accomplished by the simple technique of dyeing drab natural fibers, but the simple sewing needle is a technical innovation that's lead to a means of producing more ornate dress. A recent open access article in Science Advances investigates the use of delicate eyed needles in the Paleolithic as the means for producing refined, ornamented dress. One argument for clothing's becoming a means of decoration is that traditional body decoration, such as body painting with ochre, weren't effective in cold climates, since clothing was needed all the time for survival. Homo sapiens arrived in Europe at around 45,000 BC, and the earliest known eyed needles appeared in Siberia around 40,000 BC, in the Caucasus around 38,000 BC, in West Asia around 30,000 BC, and in Europe around 26,000 BC. Clothing the human body regardless of climate is a social practice that's persisted to this day. The eyed needle combined the processes of hole puncture and threading to allow finer and more efficient sewing.

Deep thought is what distinguishes humans from other animals. The brain is the medium for thought; so, there's the idea that brain size is important, with larger brains allowing more profound thought. Larger brains in hominids appears to have an evolutionary advantage, but the largest animals do not have proportionally larger brains. For the last century, conventional wisdom was that body mass in mammals could be described by a power law. A British research team has created a large dataset of brain and body sizes from about 1,500 species to determine the trend in brain size evolution, finding that the trend is brain size and body mass is not log-linear, but rather log-curvilinear, plateauing at high body mass. The research team found that all groups of mammals demonstrated rapid bursts of evolutionary change, not only towards larger brain size, but smaller as well. Bats very rapidly reduced their brain size, suggesting that flight may have imposed an evolutionary constraint. Homo sapiens has evolved more than twenty times faster than all other mammalian species, resulting in the massive brain size of modern man. Primates, rodents, and carnivores show a tendency for increase in relative brain size as they evolved. It appears that there is something preventing brains from getting too big, perhaps because big brains beyond a certain size are simply too costly to maintain. This upper limit of brain size applies to animals with very different biology.